Monday, April 11, 2011

More sugar on that please

We talked in class about the difference in approaching life with the mindset of Apollo vs. the mindset of Dionysian. Apollo approached situations with a self comforting attitude whereas Dionysian took more of the "it is what it is" approach. I fear that in our culture we have been programmed to believe life will always work out, no matter what happens we will survive another day, much like Apollo would think. But what of the realities of this world? Everyday people suffer, lose loved ones, and even die. But it is easy to numb ourselves to this in our homes and life that we deem "safe and normal." But are we really? What happens when we find ourselves in a situation that we never thought we would be in? We have no idea how to progress and move forward because we have ignored the experience that others have gathered in their misfortune. Rather than sugar coating the world around us, why don't we begin to look at it how it truly is. If we do not like it can we not begin to take a stand to change it. But let us not forget to learn from our own experiences and the lives of those around us. It is only in the understanding of the realities of how things truly are that we can learn to progress and become better. If we go through life ignoring truth and pain we will never understand how to advance ourselves. But if we latch on to life, no matter what it brings, we can surely begin to understand that we all have a place of importance on this earth.

1 comment:

  1. The Truth is often a matter of convenience, an assumed self-evidence that will never change. However, history has shown us that that assumption is NOT true itself. For the past 50 Postmodern years, Truth has been debunked, deconstructed and denied. Even where it had always been held in highest moral position: in science, justice and journalism, where independent confirmation was mandatory. Scientists, judges and juries and especially journalists had a fest, relativizing the Truth, replacing it with (their) political correctness and other things. It showed how elitist that is. It triggered individuals who normally follow leaders, to follow their own common sense for a change. Following became more important than leading, so that on Twitter and in the Tea parties it is now hard to identify any leader for that can change any day or minute. But worse is that people have been wronged in the cultural/historical/philosophical experiment of the Frankfurter Schule and its deconstructionist-destructivist French followers (beginning with Sartre). Those people struggle for their lives now.

    ReplyDelete