Mills

Mills said, "It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a foot satisfied." I'm not sure if I agree with this or not. It does make sense to me that, and I do agree, that is is better to experience both - to wallow in the mud and study philosophy. However, if you are satisfied what need is their to search for more? What need is their to become dissatisfied with what you have? Does this not mean that you are always searching and never reach a point where you are completely satisfied? Where you can be happy with what you have experienced? Does this mean that life will never be satisfying?